Tesla’s Robotaxis Are a Lie: They’re Still Driven by Humans in San Francisco Bay Area
In an attempt to paint itself as a pioneer in autonomous transportation, Tesla has once again tangled in the legal and regulatory quagmire with its so-called “Robotaxi” service in the San Francisco Bay Area. The company’s latest earnings report highlighted its progress on its robotaxis, but beneath the same misleading label, it’s clear that what Tesla is offering are not driverless vehicles—rather, a fleet of rides where human drivers take turns behind the wheel to simulate an entirely autonomous operation.
Tesla has long been known for its marketing stunts. From its claimed level 10 of autonomy (which is obviously just a clever way of saying it’s not actually driving at all) to its frequent claims that its vehicles are operating without human intervention, the company has long painted itself as a step ahead in the fight against traditional automotive industries.
But this time, Tesla is taking its “autonomous” spin to another level—with a focus on its Bay Area operations. The company’s press release highlighted that it had begun testing driverless cars in Austin earlier this year—but even there, it seems Tesla is at best partially autonomous and at worst entirely reliant on human drivers.
The crux of the issue lies in the word “robotaxi.” In reality, what Tesla has rolled out are driverless cars—fully operational vehicles that lack any semblance of true autonomy. Instead of being fully autonomous, these “Robots” rely on human drivers to operate them under the hood.
In the Bay Area, Tesla has positioned its service as a full-fledged driverless taxi operation. It markets itself as a “ride-hailing service,” using the same language that it employs for its Austin operations where it tests its driverless cars.
But here’s the rub: Tesla has not applied for any permits to operate fully autonomous vehicles in California. As per state regulations, Tesla cannot use these cars for passenger transportation without proper permits. And even if it had the permits, it wouldn’t be able to legally claim that the cars are operating autonomously—the technology is simply too advanced and unreliable.
In reality, most of these “Robots” are being driven by humans. Tesla has a naming convention that is, to say the least, misleading. It calls its driverless cars “Full Self-Driving,” which it often refers to as FSD (Full Self-Driving). But in reality, this level of autonomy does not exist. The technology is far from capable of handling all situations.
According to Tesla’s own documentation and press reports, most of these cars are being driven by humans at all times—occasionally switching to manual driving when the system detects an unavoidable obstacle or failure. This is especially evident in areas where the car cannot detect any potential collisions or obstacles due to its reliance on driver input.
Tesla’s Bay Area marketing campaign has been rife with misleading claims and false narratives for years. The company often touts its progress as an “industry leader” in autonomous vehicle technology, but when it comes to legal operations, its claims are often nothing more than hype.
The company has applied for permits in other states like Arizona, Florida, and Nevada—but the issue in California is particularly pressing because of Tesla’s strong presence there. If Tesla continues to market its Bay Area “Robotaxis” as autonomous without proper permits or legal status, it could end up creating a public relations nightmare.
This kind of manipulation has only gotten worse over the years. Tesla once again used its earnings call to downplay the lack of permits and deflect responsibility for its operations in California—despite having clearly stated before that its Bay Area efforts were not autonomous.
The implications for investors are clear: Tesla is using this marketing gambit to pump up its stock prices while hiding its true intentions. If Tesla continues down this misleading path, it could lead to significant risks—not just for the company but also for the broader automotive industry.
In its latest earnings call, Elon Musk claimed that Tesla’s “Robots” would cover 25-50% of the U.S. population by the end of this year. This is a bold and unrealistic claim, but it reflects Tesla’s tendency to inflate its capabilities.
If Tesla continues to market its Bay Area operations as autonomous—and if it succeeds in getting permits for other states—its claims could become even more staggering. Investors will need to be cautious about where they place their bets because this company is not playing fair.
It’s worth noting that Tesla has used similar tactics before, including in its Q3 earnings call. But this time, it has included the deception in a filing—something that makes it even more difficult to trust its current narratives.
The company’s history of misleading investors is well-documented, and this latest attempt to pump its stock is another step in a long-standing pattern. If Tesla continues to operate in this way, investors could find themselves caught off guard when the truth comes out.
This kind of deception has far-reaching implications beyond just the Bay Area or Tesla’s immediate operations. It signals a broader trend in the automotive industry: companies are increasingly using misleading narratives and false claims to gain an edge over competitors—and investors.
The potential consequences for the industry as a whole could be catastrophic if Tesla continues down this path. Investors will need to carefully evaluate their exposure to such companies—especially those that have a history of making false claims about their capabilities.
At its core, this issue is not just about Tesla or even the Bay Area—it’s about the broader automotive industry and how companies are using misleading narratives to manipulate public perception. If Tesla continues to operate in this way, it could set a dangerous precedent for other companies that follow suit.
In a world where information is abundant but truth is scarce, investors need to be extra cautious when evaluating the claims of any company—especially those with a history of misleading stakeholders. Tesla’s current narrative about its “Robots” is another reminder of why investors must remain vigilant.
In conclusion, Tesla’s marketing campaign for its Bay Area “Robotaxis” is nothing short of a deception that has the potential to hurt both the company and its stakeholders. Investors will need to be extra cautious as the truth emerges—and if Tesla continues down this misleading path, it could set a dangerous precedent for other companies in the industry.
This issue highlights the importance of transparency and honesty in business operations—especially when it comes to technologies like autonomous vehicles that have the potential to profoundly impact industries and economies. For now, Tesla may be able to deflect some scrutiny by positioning itself as a leader in innovation—but history suggests that such claims are often hollow.
Source:
